![]() |
|
one question about groove - Printable Version +- XOR Userforum (https://forum.xor.eu) +-- Forum: Products (https://forum.xor.eu/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: NerdSEQ (https://forum.xor.eu/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +---- Forum: General Questions (https://forum.xor.eu/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +---- Thread: one question about groove (/showthread.php?tid=555) |
one question about groove - ello - 12-13-2019 maybe again just some misunderstanding on my side. but, how exactly is the groove setting working? from my understanding i can offset the actual trigger of a step by changing the value of steps groove. however, it seems that if i do so, not only that step, but the whole pattern is affected by that. how is it used properly? i seem to not understand it RE: one question about groove - skybox - 12-14-2019 Groove can be used any way you like, but ideally if you're trying to keep all the patterns/tracks in "sync" you make sure that by the end of the pattern it adds up to the original total of ticks (this is how I mentally handle it), so if you wanted swing, you would subtract from 6, and then add whatever you subtracted elsewhere (usually the step immediately after). RE: one question about groove - ello - 12-14-2019 thanks. this makes sense... i wasn't aware of the fact that the total substeps add together and thus the actual pattern length is modified RE: one question about groove - XORadmin - 12-14-2019 It's even that with a groove a step length is modified...which is of course not necessary the gatelength. RE: one question about groove - ello - 12-14-2019 so, one can even create somekind of polyrythms by using just the groove setting and not altering the step count at all RE: one question about groove - XORadmin - 12-14-2019 Exactly. The sickest polyrhythms you can imagine
RE: one question about groove - ello - 12-14-2019 just tried it :) the more i do the more i love the sequencer. previously i was more into pure random regenerative patching and the nerdseq now gives so many opportunities. |