Hi!
I have a pattern on a CV16 track. 40 (aka 64) steps long. I place the cursor in row 00, column 1 (top leftmost) and hit SHIFT+MARK. Now I move the cursor to row 2F, column 6 (3rd page, bottom right) and hit SHIFT+UP+DELETE.
My expectation is now the content of former rows 30-3F is in rows 00-0F and the rows 10-3F are empty.
What I find is that there is content in 00-0F (haven't checked carefully if it actually is from formerly 30-3F) and there also is content in 10-2F. 30-3F were empty in my test.
Am I doing something silly/stupid or is there a problem with SHIFT+UP+DELETE in CV16 patterns?
Kind regards.
Michael
PS: I have a work around in that I SHIFT+MARK all the rows 30-3F, hit SHIFT+MARK again, move to row 00, column 1 and hit SHIFT+COPY and then delete rows 10-3F. But that is less comfortable.
I have a pattern on a CV16 track. 40 (aka 64) steps long. I place the cursor in row 00, column 1 (top leftmost) and hit SHIFT+MARK. Now I move the cursor to row 2F, column 6 (3rd page, bottom right) and hit SHIFT+UP+DELETE.
My expectation is now the content of former rows 30-3F is in rows 00-0F and the rows 10-3F are empty.
What I find is that there is content in 00-0F (haven't checked carefully if it actually is from formerly 30-3F) and there also is content in 10-2F. 30-3F were empty in my test.
Am I doing something silly/stupid or is there a problem with SHIFT+UP+DELETE in CV16 patterns?
Kind regards.
Michael
PS: I have a work around in that I SHIFT+MARK all the rows 30-3F, hit SHIFT+MARK again, move to row 00, column 1 and hit SHIFT+COPY and then delete rows 10-3F. But that is less comfortable.
