11-02-2023, 12:46 PM
Hi folks,
I've been experiencing inconsistency with row probability. This has been an issue for some time and every time i come back to Nerdseq work this leaves me scratching my head. It seems to occur for me across a range of contexts. Patterns seem to inherit a low row probability for example from a previous pattern despite the new pattern being set to 100% probability. I'm now wondering if my expected behavior for FX is wrong!
E.G: I often place PROV Row Probability (say 30%) into an FX column but then place another one at 100% before the end of the bar. Often the second seems to be ignored. Is it possibly that what is happening is that the second FX is ignored based on the 30% probability? Or should i be expecting a row probability to fully update regardless of previous row probability?
Or the following: Is there a hierarchy between the FX columns? If i place a transpose FX on column 2 and then place a PRF 2 (FX Probability row 2) on row three that sets row 2 FX to 50% probability then this doesn't work. It only seems to work if i place it one step earlier.
Basically i would like a way of simply assigning a specific Row or CV/TR/MOD a probability without incurring the Knob behaviour that results in inheritance problems. Is there a best practice here?
Thanks!
I've been experiencing inconsistency with row probability. This has been an issue for some time and every time i come back to Nerdseq work this leaves me scratching my head. It seems to occur for me across a range of contexts. Patterns seem to inherit a low row probability for example from a previous pattern despite the new pattern being set to 100% probability. I'm now wondering if my expected behavior for FX is wrong!
E.G: I often place PROV Row Probability (say 30%) into an FX column but then place another one at 100% before the end of the bar. Often the second seems to be ignored. Is it possibly that what is happening is that the second FX is ignored based on the 30% probability? Or should i be expecting a row probability to fully update regardless of previous row probability?
Or the following: Is there a hierarchy between the FX columns? If i place a transpose FX on column 2 and then place a PRF 2 (FX Probability row 2) on row three that sets row 2 FX to 50% probability then this doesn't work. It only seems to work if i place it one step earlier.
Basically i would like a way of simply assigning a specific Row or CV/TR/MOD a probability without incurring the Knob behaviour that results in inheritance problems. Is there a best practice here?
Thanks!