11-20-2025, 06:57 AM
Is it possible to somehow assign 16n faders to nerdseq parameters in a more row-efficient manner?
Like right now I have the following metronome script in Teletype polling the 16n and forwarding the data to the NerdSeq
M:
L 0 15: SC.CV I FADER I
In the NerdSeq mapping screen I have n = 16 rows ...
I2C SCCV 0 > TR xx xx
I2C SCCV 1 > TR xx xx
...
I2C SCCV 15 > TR xx xx
This is taking up a lot of mappings, i have a parameter with a value that's skipping over 16 to instead active a second set, which makes for a second set of 16 plus two "SKIP" rows.
Like right now I have the following metronome script in Teletype polling the 16n and forwarding the data to the NerdSeq
M:
L 0 15: SC.CV I FADER I
In the NerdSeq mapping screen I have n = 16 rows ...
I2C SCCV 0 > TR xx xx
I2C SCCV 1 > TR xx xx
...
I2C SCCV 15 > TR xx xx
This is taking up a lot of mappings, i have a parameter with a value that's skipping over 16 to instead active a second set, which makes for a second set of 16 plus two "SKIP" rows.