03-09-2026, 06:57 PM
(03-09-2026, 06:45 PM)philosopherstone Wrote:(05-23-2019, 09:29 PM)XORadmin Wrote: I think the best would be using the dinsync or Midi option for both clockwise.
As for functionality..the expanders give you more outputs but not more tracks and not more sample tracks, automators etc. So it definitely depends on your needs. And controlling 2 NerdSEQ live is double the trouble than controlling just one.
So they are pro's and con's and maybe even another sequencer in combination makes sense.
Reviving this old thread as I'm on the same path. I'm currently syncing my Nerdseqs via the analog clock in/output. In my experience syncing works better with analog clocks rather than MIDI, that's why I chose this path. Is there a specific reason why you recommended dinsync or midi option to sync them?
Basically with the 1/16 clock the real bpm and speed need to be calculated and approximated with every clock. That is not needed with dinsync or midi.
Midi just sends what is needed + if you use SPP you can synchronize also the pattern rows which makes it easier to make music with more tracks and 2 devices.
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!

