random modulation to envelopes

[Bleep bleep]

It doesn't really make sense to do it like this, trust me.

Ok i trust you

But i still think in some cases we would have interest not to overwrite the values of the current values screen.
To choose wich of the 4 fx column overwrite or not  for every track would be the best...

I am not sure if it works with the envelope functions as it still doesn't look what additional functionality the FX parameters have.

It seems to work quite good if it is set to the good range, to affect only the parameters we want
(but no way to have two automators each on different parameters).

That could be an idea indeed. It would be in the way for the requested function that with shift the start position of the mark could change though. But i see the benefit of marking like notes and transpose them all (this you can do of course with the marked values in the nerd menu, but that would directly be the easier way for all kind of marked values (including it's destructive possibility ;-)  )

In my opinion this would be better, we can start marking from somewhere else if needed, but curently its not possible to increment or decrement a column that have different values in each steps.(appart from notes)
Also if find it more logical as this is the same use for shift while not marking.

LSDJ user since nearly 20 years actually and i know all about it.

Nice! 
One more question, do you plan to add something like the B command for the tables in LSDJ? (maybe hop)

To have probability to jump to a specific row allow very nice complex tables.

So we can create some kind of islands inside the tables with a probability to jump to the next one.

Also, (sorry last one, i dont want to bother you more!) do you plan one more effect column in the tables?(independent from the other one would be awesome).

In case you didn't know, i developed the first real Midi interface for LSDJ (and Nanoloop) called LSDJMC2, long before Arduinoboy (which I also helped building up in the begin) and also for LPGT. So i know exactly what I'm talking about :-)

Great, i didn't know!
So you are more than familiar with LSDJ ! 

All my respect and thanks again