01-21-2021, 01:57 PM
Ah, sorry. I hadn't experimented with PROW and I thought it behaved differently. I thought if PROW was 0 it would actually skip the row (so that the row pointer would not stay on it for a clock pulse but just immediately go to the following step).
When I set up a test pattern to verify this, I found that the clock pointer still stays on the row for a pulse, but the contents of the row (except for FX4) are treated as a noop.
When I set up a test pattern to verify this, I found that the clock pointer still stays on the row for a pulse, but the contents of the row (except for FX4) are treated as a noop.