03-05-2021, 04:39 PM
I’m just thinking aloud here, and will honestly admit that I didn’t get in front of the NerdSEQ to play around with these thoughts, but I’m temped to think that this and the track/row start functions of the sequencer screen could be aligned a fair bit in terms of behaviour.
On that screen there are button combo variations that cover switching at pattern end, switching at live quantize point, etc. I imagine that this kind of “leading track” variant could happen on that screen, and that a live quantize variant could happen via FX, and so on.
In that way, most (if perhaps not all) of this kind of syncing could be achieved either on that screen or via FX, and in a fashion consistent with one another.
Sensible? Stupid?
On that screen there are button combo variations that cover switching at pattern end, switching at live quantize point, etc. I imagine that this kind of “leading track” variant could happen on that screen, and that a live quantize variant could happen via FX, and so on.
In that way, most (if perhaps not all) of this kind of syncing could be achieved either on that screen or via FX, and in a fashion consistent with one another.
Sensible? Stupid?