04-04-2021, 09:22 PM
Yeah I looked into it and I agree that the accumulate functions are not possible like this with the current NerdSEQ functions. And i doubt it will be in the future. As i see it, this seems to be a possible thing for one sequence/loop and they are not many states to save here. But to have like for every possible note in every pattern a kind of counter which keeps the state of the last accumulation...well double the memory I‘d say.
I see the fun of it for sure, but getting this done even within only a loop would mean some menu diving and that is something I want to avoid. I guess you could get parts of it using combinations with tables and maybe the add/sub functions.
It‘s interesting for sure...
I see the fun of it for sure, but getting this done even within only a loop would mean some menu diving and that is something I want to avoid. I guess you could get parts of it using combinations with tables and maybe the add/sub functions.
It‘s interesting for sure...
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!