04-06-2021, 02:56 PM
I'm certainly not here to advocate the Metropolix or it's Accumulate function. AFAIC it is less powerful than tables [could be] and the idea is not new at all either. The UI seems nice though. For me Accumulate has just been the trigger when I realized it effectively does Arpeggios on a per note base.
From what I've seen it seems difficult to construct meaningful evolving pattern, something I clearly see I could do with tables that allow me to define arbitrary and musically useful sequences (NerdSEQ) as opposed to having to find a building rule (Metropolix) for my sequence.
But hang on...I get differently "clocked" tables when I put them on different tracks?
That of course brings me a long way towards what I'm looking for
I will have to merge them outside (of the NerdSEQ) then, but that's what I have my various Adder bought for anyway
There definitely seems to be quite a lot of hidden knowledge regarding tables that is not in the manual and not easily accessible by playing with them.
Kind regards,
Michael
From what I've seen it seems difficult to construct meaningful evolving pattern, something I clearly see I could do with tables that allow me to define arbitrary and musically useful sequences (NerdSEQ) as opposed to having to find a building rule (Metropolix) for my sequence.
But hang on...I get differently "clocked" tables when I put them on different tracks?
That of course brings me a long way towards what I'm looking for
I will have to merge them outside (of the NerdSEQ) then, but that's what I have my various Adder bought for anyway
There definitely seems to be quite a lot of hidden knowledge regarding tables that is not in the manual and not easily accessible by playing with them.
Kind regards,
Michael