06-08-2021, 12:13 PM
Actually no chance for this.
It is already quite complex for people to track on which steps the different tracks are running. Having now in additional in-track timings would make it unmaintainable. Tracks 7 and 8 if used as audio tracks got actually 2 timelines each. But even here it is very complex to understand how things are running and that they can be independent.
This is getting more tricky once different grooves are involved.
If you want to reach this kind of behaviour for modular tracks I suggest to use tables which would add an additional time related or unrelated layer and these can include also the functions you want.
And else involve a 2nd track to get a similar behaviour.
It is already quite complex for people to track on which steps the different tracks are running. Having now in additional in-track timings would make it unmaintainable. Tracks 7 and 8 if used as audio tracks got actually 2 timelines each. But even here it is very complex to understand how things are running and that they can be independent.
This is getting more tricky once different grooves are involved.
If you want to reach this kind of behaviour for modular tracks I suggest to use tables which would add an additional time related or unrelated layer and these can include also the functions you want.
And else involve a 2nd track to get a similar behaviour.
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!