I'm not quite sure what precisely is meant by "sample choking" (I understand the open/closed HH use case).
FWIW I would be fine with SETW being able to set a sample when there is none playing. AFAICT that would also allow for at least the basic choking use cases. What I mean is that SETW sets a sample to play as if it would have been placed in the sample column. I'm indifferent whether the current restriction that SETW does not override a sample that is placed in the sample column in the same row should stay or be removed although I lean towards removing it as I don't understand the rationale behind it (read: I might change my mind once I understand the reason for it
)
FWIW I would be fine with SETW being able to set a sample when there is none playing. AFAICT that would also allow for at least the basic choking use cases. What I mean is that SETW sets a sample to play as if it would have been placed in the sample column. I'm indifferent whether the current restriction that SETW does not override a sample that is placed in the sample column in the same row should stay or be removed although I lean towards removing it as I don't understand the rationale behind it (read: I might change my mind once I understand the reason for it
)