Yesterday, 12:01 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 01:06 PM by beep.et.cetera.
Edit Reason: Had a new thought
)
Hi
I'm working with random ranges as a means to control the sequencer using STSP combined with RDMN commands, and it would be super cool to have a 0% chance of deviating from the current fx setting, since I'm bouncing back and forth between the first two patterns with the 0%-1% setting. Is there a reason why it isn't like that already?
Cheers,
Edit: would be cool if 0% just would omit the random trigger, but I'm just thinking aloud.
I'm working with random ranges as a means to control the sequencer using STSP combined with RDMN commands, and it would be super cool to have a 0% chance of deviating from the current fx setting, since I'm bouncing back and forth between the first two patterns with the 0%-1% setting. Is there a reason why it isn't like that already?
Cheers,
Edit: would be cool if 0% just would omit the random trigger, but I'm just thinking aloud.

