02-06-2026, 01:47 AM
Found a solution that works for me.
I forgot to add the necessary offset. The incoming values from GLOB BPM are scaled differently then the outgoing ones.
Additonally I changed the controller mode for the encoder i use, from bipolar to unipolar. Not quite sure if that has any effect on the data send from the controller, but now it works.
Here is my current setting:
The values from row 06 and 07 could also be fixed ones, but i found it easier to think about the ranges by dividing from top down.
I forgot to add the necessary offset. The incoming values from GLOB BPM are scaled differently then the outgoing ones.
Additonally I changed the controller mode for the encoder i use, from bipolar to unipolar. Not quite sure if that has any effect on the data send from the controller, but now it works.
Here is my current setting:
Code:
| 00 | ---- | ---- | ---- |>| ---- | ---- | ---- |
| 01 | ---- | ---- | ---- |>| ---- | ---- | ---- |
| 02 | GLOB | BPM | ---- |>| ---- | ---- | ---- | (just a placeholder > care, has a different scaling then the outgoing values to BPM!!!)
| 03 | ---- | ---- | ---- |>| ---- | ---- | ---- |
| 04 | MCC | TC1 | # 35 |>| SETV | V C | ---- | Read CC35 and set it to Variable C
| 05 | VAR | RW05 | #FFF |>| ---- | ---- | ---- | Set row 05 to 4095
| 06 | CALC | DIV | 05|=8|>| ---- | ---- | ---- | Set row 6 to 4095/8 = ~512 (row 6 and 7 for range adjustments)
| 07 | CALC | DIV | 05|=3|>| ---- | ---- | ---- | Set row 7 to 4095/3 = 1365
| 08 | VAR | # C | SRC |>| ---- | ---- | ---- | References C for followup range command
| 09 | GLOB | RNGE | 06|07|>| GLOB | TMPO | ---- | sets the BPM range from 63PM to 167BPM
| 0A | ---- | ---- | ---- |>| ---- | ---- | ---- |
| 0B | ---- | ---- | ---- |>| ---- | ---- | ---- |The values from row 06 and 07 could also be fixed ones, but i found it easier to think about the ranges by dividing from top down.