Posts: 30
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2019
Reputation:
0
Regarding the clock source of the table, I have a step that will be affected by the CBPB 1xx clock. I want to synchronize the speed of the table with this step, but I find that I can't do it because the table will always only synchronize with the main clock tick. I tried using spfx 011 but it only sends a tick. How can I make the table obtain the actual clock of the pattern? Thanks
Posts: 30
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2019
Reputation:
0
Oh, OK, I see. Can we add a clock source that can be synchronized with the row step in future firmware? The reason is that if I use variable clock like a /32 clock at a certain step and then return to the normal clock, it will be unusual because the table at that step is still synchronized with the master clock.
Posts: 30
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2019
Reputation:
0
Hello, dear administrator, I really need help. I encountered a problem when trying to use spfx or mapping to generate ticks for the table that are synchronized with the pattern clock. I used spfx 011 and it only generated a tick. So what's the use of this? Or how to use it? I really have no idea, follow me to try mapping. I wrote the following
TRCK TRK6 PTRW -> SETV RW0E SRC
CALC CNT 0E=0 -> TABL TB00 TICK
I want to make the TB00 clock follow the track 6 whose clock speed I changed. I thought I could get the timing of the track row and then convert the count output to the Tablel tick, but it still doesn't work. Can you teach me how to do it? Thank you.
Posts: 30
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2019
Reputation:
0
Update: After trying to use CALC SHTR, I finally got the answer. I realized that I couldn't get a table clock that was not synchronized with my variable clock. It turned out that I had always misunderstood the operation of nerdseq. I thought that when I set the clock in a step, such as a /32 step, it would stretch the number of ticks, that is, increase the interval of 6 ticks, but the fact is no. In fact, this step is still calculated based on the master clock tick, just multiplying it. So no matter what I do, the table tick will still be synchronized with the master clock. I think there are two possibilities to solve my situation:
1. I will make all the clock numbers into a table format such as div 2 1 div 4 1... and so on.
2. Just see if I can update the clock based on the length of each step in the future, that is, the length of one row.