A track type focused just on MIDI CC control, note control would be an FX. I'm using ES-9 as a giant matrix mixer and I'd really like to have 16 lanes (or more) of configurable CC's that I can turn up/down, or even have a little bit of LFO or envelope sends. Each channel could be label-able too that way you don't have to memorize all of the CC's.

The ES-9 can take 128 CC's of control change #'s for controlling level and pan, it's really awesome to use outside of a PC. Multiple pages of 16 lanes of CC control would be amazing.

Looks like the new NE mixer, Xer Mixa, also supports MIDI and could use something like this...

https://manuals.noiseengineering.us/xm/#...cification

Dear Nerdseq'ers

I read the manual and have not come across something in mind. I would love to be able to set a CV Mod value of 0V on step 0 of a pattern and for instance a CV Mod value of 10V on step 40 of a pattern and have it "interpolate" the mod output from step 0 to Step 40. I Know I could trigger an LFO, but I wanted to know if this specific approach is a thing. Am I just missing something? or is this something that is not possible currently. 

Thanks for the reply!

Hi folks,

I've been experiencing inconsistency with row probability. This has been an issue for some time and every time i come back to Nerdseq work this leaves me scratching my head. It seems to occur for me across a range of contexts. Patterns seem to inherit a low row probability for example from a previous pattern despite the new pattern being set to 100%  probability. I'm now wondering if my expected behavior for FX is wrong!

E.G: I often place PROV Row Probability (say 30%) into an FX column but then place another one at 100% before the end of the bar. Often the second seems to be ignored. Is it possibly that what is happening is that the second FX is ignored based on the 30% probability? Or should i be expecting a row probability to fully update regardless of previous row probability?

Or the following: Is there a hierarchy between the FX columns? If i place a transpose FX on column 2 and then place a PRF 2 (FX Probability row 2) on row three that sets row 2 FX to 50% probability then this doesn't work. It only seems to work if i place it one step earlier.

Basically i would like a way of simply assigning a specific Row or CV/TR/MOD a probability without incurring the Knob behaviour that results in inheritance problems. Is there a best practice here?

Thanks!

I noticed that on the cv expander when I have a global negative transposition set (and allowed in the cv16 track setup menu) the value c-0 specifically seems to be sending out a ultra high cv signal, so high that it only becomes audible in the receiving oscillator when pitched down another few octaves. I noticed this when mixing in a sub oscillator at -2octaves. took me forever to figure out that it had to do with the global negative transposition.

some info: 

- Everything is set to 0-10 v

- as there are no modulator symbols at the top I'm guessing there are no active modulators.

- to the best of my knowledge all glides are off and there are no active automators/patches


some observations:

- the level of the resulting high cv signal doesn't react in parallel to further negative changes of the global transposition as one might expect. the high cv signal remains at the same level. 

- changing the pitch of the receiving oscillator shifts the resulting pitch as expected so I'm guessing it is in actuality a cv signal as opposed to some sort of oscillator feedback /bleed  issue
- issue only occurs with the cv expander and is independent of the output
- issue is independent of pure/add settings of the cv16 track setup menu
- issue disappears when global transposition is set to 0 or any positive value
- issue disappears when transposition is not allowed in the cv16 track setup menu
- I can recreate the issue with a new project

here's a clip:

https://youtube.com/shorts/GM5vcQHfFDk?feature=share

I'd be grateful if someone could try this out on their own setup so that I can verify or exclude the possibility of it being my own stupidity or setup.

thanks!

On the cv 16 pattern screen I have come across the issue where if I surpass the note values + hexadecimal values by mistake and the tracker reads one of the internal envelopes + then I switch back to note values the tracker will cease to read any new note values.
it's like it's stuck or something. 
Also there is a mystical "^" symbol next to the cv output destination indicator of the corresponding column. what does this mean? 
In order to get rid of the issue I ended up restaring the project. 

Anyone know what's going on in this situation?

   

thanks

Dear community, 

I used the search function & did not find anything on this so I here goes. I would love to be able to have a custom screensaver on the Nerdseq, it would give people a way to express themselves in their Modular. Since I do not know if the current one is a video file, I dont know how hard this would be to implement. 

Regards,
M.

I’m trying to copy and paste a block of note values from the cv column into the mod column of the same track but this doesn’t seem to be working- as soon as i try to paste it into the mod column it pastes into the note column (which the cursor isn’t on). Is this a bug?
Thanks

It's my first delve into producing FM sounds through Nerdseq running firmware 1.27A and I have a problem with the output plus other issues:

I have set up channel 7 as per the manual suggestions assigning 'Sine' waves to both OP1 & OP2. OP2 is set up as the modulation source for OP1 and muted. I have created a short 16 step pattern on Audio channel 7 and experimented with volume settings but the level of the output is so so quiet. A volume envelope via the 'Automate' cancels the sound completely. Also, I have tried to boost the signal through Intellijel Amps, and here's the weird part,  there is no signal present(??). 

Any suggestion of a 'proper' set up to achieve FM through Nerdseq would be truly appreciated.

Thanks.

Hi
I m actually working on a Live session and unfortunately...arrived at the end of the 176 patterns of 64 steps.
I"m pretty sure if I carrefully check all the patterns i wrote I will find a lot of same(duplicate) pattern structures
Is it possible to create some kind of patterns scanner in order to optimize the number of empty patterns?
thanks in advance 
best regards

Since it's unlikely that the track count of the Nerdseq will be increased despite the expanders eating up tracks, perhaps two Nerdseqs could be linked, so that the sequencer screen of the Follower is an extension of the Leader? Meaning, when a row is triggered on the Leader, it is also triggered on the Follower, and so forth. This would make live use of two nerdseqs much easier. 

Maybe possible with I2C, or a CV out to CV In connection? You'd sell more Nerdseqs, and users like me could get 4 each of CV and Trigger tracks and still have 6 modular and 2 sample tracks.