| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 1.812
» Latest member: snkyfkr
» Forum threads: 2.067
» Forum posts: 12.140
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 287 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 283 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google
|
| Latest Threads |
FW Update of VEX does not...
Forum: Beauty and less important bugs/glitches
Last Post: mgd
11-02-2026, 03:39 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 27
|
Feature Request: Mapping ...
Forum: Feature requests
Last Post: XORadmin
11-02-2026, 12:51 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 66
|
One Time Trig
Forum: NerdSEQ
Last Post: XORadmin
11-02-2026, 12:42 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 45
|
Broken Redirect Links?
Forum: Website issues
Last Post: fossilizeme
11-02-2026, 03:26 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 43
|
Random choices
Forum: General Questions
Last Post: joesh
10-29-2026, 10:35 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 75
|
Release Candidate Firmwar...
Forum: Firmware / Manual
Last Post: XORadmin
10-29-2026, 08:35 PM
» Replies: 20
» Views: 2.573
|
Ratchet Randomly or Just ...
Forum: General Questions
Last Post: dangerBreak
10-29-2026, 08:00 PM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 184
|
Output a clock divider on...
Forum: General Questions
Last Post: XORadmin
10-28-2026, 10:34 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 99
|
Hallucinatory MIDI CC com...
Forum: Beauty and less important bugs/glitches
Last Post: XORadmin
10-28-2026, 10:02 PM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 1.386
|
Option to set Range on Ra...
Forum: Feature requests
Last Post: XORadmin
10-28-2026, 10:01 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 120
|
|
|
| Copy Paste Velocity Values on MIDI Tracks |
|
Posted by: Karlo - 09-12-2021, 08:51 PM - Forum: Feature requests
- No Replies
|
 |
I realized I couldn’t copy and paste just the velocity values from MIDI tracks I had to adjust hundreds of steps of velocity one by one. Any chance we could get the copy paste functionality added to include velocity values on the midi tracks column?
|
|
|
| [FIXED] FX Bug in More Triggers 16 Track |
|
Posted by: Elektro GOWK - 09-11-2021, 07:46 PM - Forum: Beauty and less important bugs/glitches
- No Replies
|
 |
Hi Thomas,
there is a problem in the More Triggers 16 track FX section.
When I select as FX the TRBL Trigger Binary Low function and set the Hex value to 0FFh (11111111), then no Trigger occurs on Trigger 1-8, respectively no lights flash up on the module. If I go one Value back 0FEh (11111110), then the lights and trigger 2-8 flash up as they should. With 000h every trigger goes back to low. Values in between work fine.
The same problem with TRBH Trigger Binary High function for Trigger output 9-16.
I have the latest firmware 1.25 RC5 installed.
Cheers
Gregor
|
|
|
| [NO BUG] CV16 Gate Out & Assimil8or |
|
Posted by: Kid Yoshi - 09-10-2021, 11:28 PM - Forum: Beauty and less important bugs/glitches
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Hey there
I'm using the CV16 with an Assimil8or and I have a track from the CV16 set up to send an envelope with zero attack, full sustain and zero release - essentially a gate. This is used to trigger the Assimil8or and it works, however the volume on the Assimil8or is ~50% lower than if I trigger it with the Nerdseq dedicated Trigger output.
I'm pretty sure the Assimi8or does not use gate for volume level and interestingly, if I set either Attack to 01 or Release to 01 then the volume jumps up to it's correct level.
It's not a deal breaker but I do find it strange. I don't have a scope to visually see what might be going on.
THX
|
|
|
| How do I stop all playing patterns repeating (not abrupt) |
|
Posted by: JX3D - 09-09-2021, 09:47 AM - Forum: General Questions
- Replies (11)
|
 |
Pressing STOP on a pattern, lets it play to the end and then stops the pattern from repeating.
Is there a way to do the same for all patterns playing (like a whole row)?
SHIFT+STOP stops them immidiatly, and I only want to stop them from repeating like when using STOP on a single pattern.
|
|
|
| Increase auto gate timeout maximum value |
|
Posted by: geremy - 09-08-2021, 03:56 PM - Forum: Feature requests
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Hi,
I find (and the scope shows) not too much different between the default and max auto gate timeout values. Can this be increased past 64? Is the unit mS? It doesn't leave very much time for envelope release currently, and I usually use auto gate for chords when the gate is on for several steps. Could it be changed to be tempo dependent?
Thanks.
Geremy
|
|
|
| Save/Load patterns and groove collumns |
|
Posted by: JX3D - 09-07-2021, 12:21 PM - Forum: Feature requests
- Replies (4)
|
 |
It would be nice if it was possible to save patterns, so they can be loaded into other projects - for example saving a modular pattern as "mdp-name", a trigger pattern as "trp-name", etc.
Also an option to save a groove collumn so grooves can be reused in same and other projects would be a cool function.
|
|
|
| Q re Envelopes on CV16 |
|
Posted by: mgd - 09-04-2021, 07:18 PM - Forum: General Questions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
I have a question regarding the 8 Envelopes of the CV16 expander.
The short form of the question is:
Are the envelopes basically parameter sets that (pre)define 8 different envelopes that I can freely use on all 16 CV outputs [answer A] or are they 8 actual envelope entities that can't be used independently on more than one CV output each [answer B]?
Longer form:
Track 1 is assigned to NSA1 which is a CV16.
Lanes 1-6 of track one are assigned to CV01-06 of NSA1 (CV16).
Let's assume the following pattern
1 2 3 4 5 6
00 C-4 ^11 E-4 ^11 G-4 ^11
01 -- ^12 -- -- -- --
02 D-4 ^11 -- ^12 -- --
03 -- ^12 F-4 ^11 -- ^12
04 E-4 ^11 -- -- A-4 ^11
05 -- ^12 -- ^12 -- --
06 E-4 ^11 G-4 -- -- --
07 -- ^12 -- ^12 -- ^12
Will the envelopes of lanes 2, 4 and 6 work independently from one another [answer A] (because they are in fact 3 different envelopes that "only" use the same settings [those of envelope 1]) or is envelope 1 one physical (virtual) envelope that is constantly released and (re)started by all 3 lanes [answer B]?
My experiments seem to indicate they are independent and thus I think it is answer A. But I'd like to know.
Maybe it is neither answer A nor answer B but something different [answer C].
Not sure I made myself clear. Please ask and I'll try to explain better.
A corolary of this question relates to the buildin LFOs. For those I think the correct answer is B.
Kind regards,
Michael
|
|
|
|